By Sarah-Jane Leslie (auth.), Robert J. Stainton, Christopher Viger (eds.)
Are usual languages surely compositional? What roles does context play in linguistic verbal exchange, and by way of what ability? particularly, does context intrude with the compositional selection of fact stipulations? What meanings should still theorists assign to sentences if compositionality is to be retained? those are the relevant questions of this significant quantity of latest philosophical essays in honour of Ernie Lepore.
Read or Download Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values: Essays in Honour of Ernie Lepore PDF
Similar essays books
Big apple instances BESTSELLER
“[This] can be as shut as Vonnegut ever involves a memoir. ”
–Los Angeles Times
“Like [that of] his literary ancestor Mark Twain, [Kurt Vonnegut’s] crankiness is good-humored and sharp-witted. . . . [Reading a guy with no nation is] like sitting down at the sofa for an extended chat with an outdated buddy. ”
–The long island instances publication Review
In a quantity that's penetrating, introspective, incisive, and laugh-out-loud humorous, one of many nice males of letters of this age–or any age–holds forth on existence, paintings, intercourse, politics, and the nation of America’s soul. From his coming of age in the United States, to his formative conflict studies, to his lifestyles as an artist, this can be Vonnegut doing what he does most sensible: Being himself. Whimsically illustrated through the writer, a guy and not using a state is intimate, gentle, and brimming with the scope of Kurt Vonnegut’s passions.
“For all those that have lived with Vonnegut of their imaginations . . . this can be what he's like in individual. ”
“Filled with [Vonnegut’s] ordinary contradictory mixture of pleasure and sorrow, wish and depression, humor and gravity. ”
“Fans will linger on each be aware . . . as once more [Vonnegut] captures the complexity of the human with wonderful calligraphic simplicity. ”
“Thank God, Kurt Vonnegut has damaged his promise that he'll by no means write one other publication. during this wondrous assemblage of mini-memoirs, we find his family’s legacy and his obstinate, retro humanism. ”
The items in Pot tales for the Soul are humorous, whimsical, weird and wonderful, poignant, informational, stunning, and, yeah, soulful. they're approximately love, hate, break out, fact, the mystical, Allen Ginsberg, Ken Kesey, Michelle Phillips, Hunter Thompson, Abbie Hoffman, Wavy Gravy and peanut butter. eventually, those tales show the large, bizarre, and lovely way of life of stoners, the place the reefers are mad, the joints are fats, and the thrill lasts for six-and-a-half days.
Contains introductory chapters on class of prokaryotes, the idea that of bacterial species, numerical and polyphasic taxonomy, bacterial nomenclature and the etymology of prokaryotic names, nucleic acid probes and their software in environmental microbiology, tradition collections, and the highbrow estate of prokaryotes.
Additional resources for Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values: Essays in Honour of Ernie Lepore
University of Nijmegen. Heim, I. (1990). E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 137–177. Higginbotham, J. (1986). Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program in semantics. In E. ), Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 29–48). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Higginbotham, J. (2003). Conditionals and compositionality. In J. ), Philosophical perspectives, 17, pp. 181–195. Janssen, Theo M. V. (1997). Compositionality. In J. van Benthem & A.
Once again, the uniqueness condition – essential for an account of “unless”-statements that do not occur under quantifiers – creates difficulties once we try to embed the statement under “no”. 2 A Modified Account of “Unless” Before we return to our main project of giving an account of “unless”-statements under quantifiers, let us consider how von Fintel’s account fares when there is an explicit adverb of quantification present in the “unless”-statement. Von Fintel (1992) formulates his account in general terms as follows: Q [C – R] [M] & ∀S (Q [C – S] [M] → R ⊆ S) where “Q” is the relevant quantifier – either a covert universal as before, or an adverb of quantification that explicitly occurs in the sentence.
They can, however, be analyzed by way of taking the “unless”statement to restrict the quantifier, albeit in a somewhat complex manner. We have seen, though, that an adequate account of unquantified “unless”-statements extends naturally to accommodate quantified “unless”-statements. 5 Conclusion A uniform semantic analysis of “if” and “unless” embedded under quantifiers is possible. These constructions thus do not pose a threat to the thesis that natural language is semantically compositional. The semantics of these statements is not, however, a straightforward matter.